Author |
Message |
DRA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:21 pm |
|
-={GGS}=- |
|
|
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:41 pm Posts: 13 Location: Spain
|
|
Top |
|
|
Monsada
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:27 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:33 pm Posts: 9
|
A good rule is always a good rule. I think doing the math by ended if it runs more than 2/3 if the server hangs is a good rule. Why do not aply it now?
If you say that you are accepting the rule, this will be ok to be aplied in any case, and of course it would be retrospective, because rules are created when a hole has been detected. If you accept the rule but not being aplied now, you are saying that do not accept the rule.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Furia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:37 pm |
|
-=GIR=- |
|
|
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:18 pm Posts: 7 Location: SPAIN
|
_________________ Peace and freedom are not free
|
|
Top |
|
|
DRA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:42 pm |
|
-={GGS}=- |
|
|
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:41 pm Posts: 13 Location: Spain
|
|
Top |
|
|
BDRSlaAnesh
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:53 pm |
|
|
this is true Furia but that rule was added because occurred that we started too late and ppl went sleep before the match was over. To prevent this, was crated that rule not the unforseeable crashes that happened.
I agree that taking decision on probability or let the commander to choose will not be the best. Unfortunately i didn't get any screen of the map when it crashed, and cannot demonstrate we were all there... just one tank was coming from base...all troup was deployed.
anyway i forgot to say GG to all !! idid enjoy and i will as well even if we repeat this match.
At last i agree saying if u accept the rule for the future u should accept it even now so to don't affect the course of the battle...then..we'll see i'll stay tuned!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Xisco
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:55 pm |
|
-=GIR=- |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:59 pm Posts: 2
|
thats it slanesh... at the end all had fun running around and firing big guns
|
|
Top |
|
|
benamaina
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:59 pm |
|
-=GIR=- |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:22 pm Posts: 57
|
Be fair? Really I cant understand this! I wondering what happens if the situation was the reverse! Not all sectors system are the same! If we have a neutral system and we fight for this sectors, and there was a counter, we can say, ehy guys, you are the winner, becouse you take the zone first and you was the owner for 1 hour 40 minutes.... Of course, this is not F1, futball or other thing! Now are wroten rules, but are not valid! Really very tired of ATC! Monsada! Macho, tu como siempre! Vaya tela marinera, pisha!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Furia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:06 pm |
|
-=GIR=- |
|
|
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:18 pm Posts: 7 Location: SPAIN
|
_________________ Peace and freedom are not free
|
|
Top |
|
|
{bdr}*nemesi*
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:10 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:22 pm Posts: 658
|
Ok Furia
This was the rule in the old ATC
It was referring to another situation, the server did not crash actually and the game terminated correctly on server
Now there are 2 rules in conflict, I forgot to amend and this was my mistake, now the rules say
"In case of technical issues we will try the best to solve them in due time, in case the delay results in more than one hour later than the official start time the battle is automatically postponed to the next week"
So this is in conflict with the old rule, from the first ATC, I forgot to amend this and to correct
Now of course I have to correct the rules to avoid conflicts
For this current battle there is nothing to say, we repeat this battle
For the future, as I said I will amend the rules
The rules will say that to consider a match valid we need to play 75% of the battle time, before this time the battle is to be repeated, after the results before the crash or the problem are taken as such
Hope this fix the problem
ps - btw the server didn't crash, as I explained it was a prob of internet connectivity
And see you in Sobor again, we will dine in Sobor or in the hell - have fun
_________________ Respectfully, Nemesi, Chief of Staff Arma Tactical Combat
|
|
Top |
|
|
{bdr}*nemesi*
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:16 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:22 pm Posts: 658
|
Hi all
Well I have answered before reading all of your answers, and these answers were unnecessary as there was nothing to say
So please keep the conversation on forum on the points and not divert it on the wrong targets
As I said before we will meet in Sobor district of Chernarus next tuesday or in the hell
Have fun!!
Hope this will close the discussion
_________________ Respectfully, Nemesi, Chief of Staff Arma Tactical Combat
|
|
Top |
|
|